ASGARBY
AND HOWELL: HOWELL
TF
134463
The present settlement of Howell is not large (Fig 10) and the surviving earthworks are typical of a shrunken village site. They comprise two groups, separated by Howell Manor and the church. In both parts can be seen sunken ways and crofts. To the west of the manor house shallow ditches outline three crofts, one of which appears to be subdivided. Abutting north is a sunken way, an extension of a lane which now only leads to farm buildings. North of this is a short length of north-south ridge and furrow abutting on a long east-west headland. South of the manor house and church the crofts are less regular, with a disturbed area in the centre of the field; they are again delimited by ridge and furrow on the south-west side (Fig 11).
Although the earthworks clearly
demonstrate that the village has been much larger than at present, the
settlement was probably always of modest size. Before the Conquest it was a
minor element in the large estate of Sleaford, but by 1066 it had been divided
into four parcels of sokeland attached to manors in Kirkby, Sleaford, Culverthorpe,
and Ewerby (1). The total recorded population was thirteen sokemen, seven
bordars, and one priest, but this figure probably includes the inhabitants of
Boughton, and possibly part of Asgarby, which seems to be included in the
account of the bishop of Lincoln's land in Howell (2), and it is clear that the
settlement was small for the wapentake and area. Later ecclesiastical taxations
and lay subsidies reveal a similar pattern. However, the settlement was clearly
not static or in slow decline throughout its history. In the twelfth and
thirteenth centuries the smaller holdings in the vill apparently remained
unmanorialised, and rents were paid to non-resident lords, but thirteen bovates
in Howell that belonged to the bishop of Lincoln's fee in Boughton, Howell, and
Asgarby were granted to a tenant for non-military service, and a knight was
enfeoffed in the land which was held of the honour of Gant (3). The effect of
these developments on the settlement are undocumented, but population growth,
as both cause and result, probably accompanied the process. The subsequent
contraction of the settlement has not been dated, but presumably began in the
fourteenth century, as elsewhere in the area, and was exacerbated by a severe
visitation of the plague in the sixteenth.
1. Lincs
DB, 1/3; 7/46; 24/31; 26/39; 67/2.
2. See under Boughton.
3. BF,
179, 1032; RA no 377; RH i, 242.