CORBY
GLEN: CASTLE MOUND
TF
001231
Situated
just to the north-east of the market place in Corby Glen (Fig 54), a large
moated site (Scheduled Monument no 100 ) seems to mark an early defended manor
house. Although described as Castle Mound on recent Ordnance Survey maps, no
trace of an associated bailey has been found. The earthwork is subrectangular
and encloses a raised centre comprising some 1,000 square metres. There is a
low inner bank along the north, east and southern sides of the mound, possibly
marking the line of a wall, and a shallow outer bank (Fig 55). The western half
of the main moat contained water at the time of survey and there was also water
in a short length of ditch on the east side of the site beyond the outer bank.
This ditch is 11 metres wide from rim to rim and three metres deep, and
although from its position it appears to be part of the complex, it has been
disturbed. The width of the main moat varies between 11 to 19 metres from rim
to rim and its depth from five to three metres. At its north-west edge the
outer bank is very slight. There are willow trees and shrubs around the edges
of the moat, but most of the site is under grass. Surrounding ground levels are
very irregular, again probably as a result of small scale quarrying, as the
limestone here is near the surface. When a bungalow was built south-west of the
site in 1973, this was confirmed by the presence of a quantity of stone, none
of it apparently structural (1).
In 1086 there were two holdings in the
vill. A manor of one carucate belonged to a certain Bricteva who had held the
estate in 1066 (2). This land was probably the forerunner of the farm that was
situated at Birkholme in the west of the parish, but no further medieval notice
has been found of the manor, and it must be assumed that it was a dependent of,
and was subsequently incorporated into, the major holding in the settlement
which was held by the bishop of Lincoln. It is this estate that can be
associated with the moated site. In 1066 the manor had belonged to Bardi, a
leading thane of the Danelaw who enjoyed extensive liberties (3). Corby, with
its soke in Bitchfield, Swayfield, and Swinstead, was probably not his
principal estate - Sleaford was almost certainly the caput since it was the grant of that soke that seems to have
conferred title to Corby on Bishop Remigius (4) - but the vill was probably of
some local importance. It was an early commercial centre - trading clearly
pre-dates the 'grant' of market and fair in 1238 - and the wapentake of
Beltisloe met in the market place (5). In 1086 the manor was held of the bishop
by a certain Walter, but in the twelfth century it was split into three.
However, it was held in parage, and the manor house in Corby, possibly within
the moat, was occupied by the Peche family in the thirteenth century (6). The
descent of the manor can be traced into the modern period. It is not clear when
the site was abandoned, but it seems to have been replaced either by an
undefended house to the north of the church or a hall to the south where traces
of a possible medieval gatehouse (Scheduled Monument no 318) can still be seen.
The manor was bought by John Thimelby of Irnham in 1561, and in the succeeding
centuries 'the Great Hall' was given over to the principal tenants of the
estate (7).
1. Sites and Monuments Record, City and
County Museum.
2. Lincs
DB, 68/18.
3. Lincs
DB, 7/39.
4. RA,
nos 2, 89.
5. RH
i, 262b.
6. BF
183, 1049; RH i, 261b.
7. D. I. A. Steel, A Lincolnshire Village: the Parish of Corby Glen in its Historical
Context, London 1979, 9-12.